C4 slams MACC chief on whistleblower protection U-turn

Topics: MACC IndependencePolitical Corruption & Conflict of InterestGood Governance & Anti-Corruption
Related news: https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/605974
Coverage by: MalaysiaKini

Graft watchdog Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4) has lambasted MACC’s chief commissioner Azam Baki over an alleged contradictory stance on whistleblower protection.

This comes after he initiated legal proceedings for defamation against the whistleblower, Lalitha Kunaratnam, despite previously showing support for whistleblower protection.

“Azam’s attempt to silence her (the whistleblower) smacks of grave intimidation and fear tactics completely unbecoming of a top graft buster.

“The exposé and Azam’s hostile response serve as yet another devastating blow to the credibility of the MACC, an institution already wrecked by corruption and criminal scandals involving its own officers.

“His legal threats upon a notable anti-corruption campaigner also reiterate the huge personal risk that whistleblowers face when exposing wrongdoing. It is the cruelest irony that it is Azam, of all people, who should be assisting Lalitha to obtain whistleblower protection,” it said in a statement today.

C4 demanded that Azam withdraw the letter of demand upon Lalitha.

Azam came under intense scrutiny after allegations surfaced about him having owned shares in two companies back in 2015.

According to Excel Force Bhd’s 2015 annual report, Azam owned 2,156,000 warrants in the company as of March 21, 2016. At the time, Azam was the head of MACC’s investigation division.

Yesterday, Lalitha – who first published the shareholding allegations against him – shared a snippet of a letter of demand (LOD) sent to her by Azam’s lawyer.

The lawyer demanded Lalitha make a public apology for a report she wrote on this matter and is asking her to pay damages amounting to RM10 million.

Whistleblower support, a lip service?

C4 claimed that this case merely proved that the provisions listed in the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA 2010) were insufficient to protect whistleblowers nor give them the confidence to come forward with information, namely Section 6 (1) WPA 2010.

Section 6 (1) limits whistleblowers to report cases to enforcement agencies only, failing which whistleblower protection would be revoked. Furthermore, it carries with it the condition that the disclosure cannot break any existing law, essentially stifling effective whistleblower efforts.

On Nov 17 last year, Azam said the MACC was in full support of amendments to the WPA 2010 as a way for “enforcement authorities being able to better convince the public to report any misdeeds”.

“Where is the support for whistleblowers now? Was this all mere lip service?

“The only right cause of action for Azam now is to immediately withdraw his LOD and prove to the public that the MACC genuinely advocates for whistleblower protection. 

“He must cease with threats to whistleblowers, and amidst this mounting criticism, declare his assets at once,” said C4.

It added that in light of the Securities Commission’s involvement, Azam should go on garden leave until all investigations into his actions have been completed.

The centre also urged for a special task force to be enacted by Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob, comprising independent personalities to conduct an investigation into Azam’s alleged wrongdoings.

“His legal threats upon a notable anti-corruption campaigner also reiterate the huge personal risk that whistleblowers face when exposing wrongdoing. It is the cruellest irony that it is Azam, of all people, who should be assisting Lalitha to obtain whistleblower protection,” it said in a statement today.

C4 demanded that Azam withdraw the letter of demand upon Lalitha.

Azam came under intense scrutiny after allegations surfaced about him having owned shares in two companies back in 2015.

According to Excel Force Bhd’s 2015 annual report, Azam owned 2,156,000 warrants in the company as of March 21, 2016. At the time, Azam was the head of MACC’s investigation division.

Yesterday, Lalitha – who first published the shareholding allegations against him – shared a snippet of a letter of demand (LOD) sent to her by Azam’s lawyer.

The lawyer demanded Lalitha make a public apology for a report she wrote on this matter and is asking her to pay damages amounting to RM10 million.

Whistleblower support, a lip service?

C4 claimed that this case merely proved that the provisions listed in the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA 2010) were insufficient to protect whistleblowers nor give them the confidence to come forward with information, namely Section 6 (1) WPA 2010.

Section 6 (1) limits whistleblowers to report cases to enforcement agencies only, failing which whistleblower protection would be revoked. Furthermore, it carries with it the condition that the disclosure cannot break any existing law, essentially stifling effective whistleblower efforts.

On Nov 17 last year, Azam said the MACC was in full support of amendments to the WPA 2010 as a way for “enforcement authorities being able to better convince the public to report any misdeeds”.

“Where is the support for whistleblowers now? Was this all mere lip service?

“The only right cause of action for Azam now is to immediately withdraw his LOD and prove to the public that the MACC genuinely advocates for whistleblower protection. 

“He must cease with threats to whistleblowers, and amidst this mounting criticism, declare his assets at once,” said C4.

It added that in light of the Securities Commission’s involvement, Azam should go on garden leave until all investigations into his actions have been completed.

The centre also urged for a special task force to be enacted by Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob, comprising independent personalities to conduct an investigation into Azam’s alleged wrongdoings.

SHARE THIS:

FACEBOOK
TWITTER

THANK YOU!

All publications by C4 Center are downloadable for free. Much resources and funds have been put into ensuring that we conduct cutting edge research work for these issues to be brought to the attention of the general public, authorities, as well as public policymakers and lawmakers. If you like our work, please do consider supporting us by donating to us. Your financial support will go a long way in ensuring that we can continue fighting for a clean, and better, Malaysia.