JOINT STATEMENT: Civil society demands that the government commit to an effective, progressive, and rights-focused FOI framework

23 JUNE 2026

Civil society demands that the government commit to an effective, progressive, and rights-focused FOI framework

As Parliament begins its Second Meeting of the year, Malaysia edges ever closer to legislating a Freedom of Information (FOI) Act. This legislation is crucial in facilitating the right to information, a right that is not only pivotal in bringing to light acts of corruption and accountability within government but, more generally, is a fundamental human right in any functioning democracy.

Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression. A progressive and purposive constitutional interpretation would justify that meaningful expression requires access to information held by public bodies and authorities. Without the right to seek, receive, and engage with information which is essential to public discourse, individuals would be unable to hold opinions, express themselves effectively, and participate in democratic governance. 

Therefore, the undersigned organisations and individuals unequivocally state that the following elements are non-negotiable for an effective, progressive, and rights-focused FOI Act and framework. In drafting this new FOI regime, the Federal Government must fully commit to implementing these elements if it truly intends to forge a new path of transparency, public accountability and democratic governance.

Fundamental principles underlying the Malaysian FOI regime

The following non-negotiable fundamental principles must be incorporated into the FOI Act. These principles are based on international human rights standards and are essential for a viable and progressive FOI regime.

• All information held by the government belongs to the public and must be openly available by default. The government is merely a custodian of this information and should restrict access to, or withhold, such information only where there are legitimate and clearly defined grounds for exemption from disclosure.
• Access to information must not be conditional. Terms or conditions cannot be imposed on a prospective applicant before they are entitled to receive information. In particular, applicants should not be required to declare or justify their reasons for making an application and seeking said information.
• Statutory grounds for non-disclosure must be exhaustive, specific, clear, and unambiguous. All exemption grounds must be balanced against the public interest and harm tests when determining whether disclosure should be granted. Any restrictions on disclosure and access to public information must be grounded in international human rights standards of legality, necessity, and proportionality. 
• Legal harmonisation is a prerequisite for a progressive FOI regime. A comprehensive harmonisation of all laws and regulations that may impact the creation and implementation of a robust FOI framework must be undertaken in tandem with the drafting of the FOI Act, e.g. the Official Secrets Act 1972, Section 203A of the Penal Code, and the Personal Data Protection Act 2010.

Scope of the Act

The Federal FOI Act must apply without restriction to all Federal Government ministries, departments, and agencies, as well as federal statutory bodies. There cannot be any exemptions for entire ministries or departments. Exemptions should only be based on the nature, sensitivity and demonstrable harm, rather than by the identity of the public authority holding it.

Regulation and oversight of the FOI regime

An independent regulatory and oversight body must be established to monitor the implementation of the FOI Act, issue binding determinations on appeals or disputes pertaining to FOI requests, and develop guidelines to operationalise and elaborate on the Act’s basic principles. Structural and institutional safeguards must be implemented to preserve the independence and autonomy of this body, and it must have full access to all relevant documents or information, notwithstanding other secrecy laws.

Regarding its function as an arbiter of disputes, the independent body must be empowered to conduct de novo merit reviews of an executive department/agency’s decision on a FOI application and not be limited to reviewing procedural compliance alone.

This function may be assigned to the proposed Ombudsman office, as long as sufficient resources (financial and staffing) are allocated to account for and effectively fulfil these dual functions.

Proactive disclosure schemes

In order to encourage a cultural shift towards transparency and accountability, legislating the FOI Act alone is insufficient. The government must also commit to creating broader policies to ensure information is published and routinely updated in an easily accessible manner. The goal should be to create an efficient proactive publication system so that an FOI request is a last resort for members of the public.

Conclusion

Beyond this, we emphasise that there must be an absolute cultural shift within the government towards greater openness, transparency, and accountability. 

As Malaysia’s democracy matures, the culture of secrecy by default and paternalistic view that ‘the government knows best’ is no longer tenable. This Parliamentary meeting presents an opportunity for the MADANI government to move beyond rhetoric and demonstrate its commitment to reform by establishing an information regime that truly empowers the people and fosters trust in the government. To achieve this, the government must work towards a framework that recognises access to information as a right rather than a privilege. 

It is vital that the government does not waste this chance.

END OF STATEMENT

Issued by (Organisations):

1. 1. The Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Center)
   2. Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ)
   3. ARTICLE 19

Endorsed by (Organisations):

1. Advocates for Non-Discrimination and Access to Knowledge (ANAK)
2. Aliran
3. All Women’s Action Society (AWAM)
4. Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM)
5. Architects of Diversity
6. Association of Women Lawyers (AWL)
7. Badan Bertindak Penduduk Flat Kos Rendah Kuchai Entrepreneurs Park, Jalan Kuchai Lama, Kuala Lumpur
8. BERSIH
9. Childline Foundation
10. Child Rights Coalition Malaysia
11. Community Action Nexus Berhad
12. Consumers’ Association of Penang
13. Damansara Utama Residents Association B1
14. ECPAT Malaysia
15. Five Arts Centre
16. Freedom Film Network
17. Gabungan Darurat Iklim Malaysia Berhad
18. Gerakan Media Merdeka (Geramm)
19. HAI MANDAK!
20. I Care Community Center
21. Ikatan Anak Muda Tawau
22. Impactlution
23. Justice for Sisters
24. Klima Action Malaysia – KAMY
25. KLSCAH Civil Rights Committee
26. Kolektif Seni dan Budaya Malaysia
27. Kuala Lumpur Residents Action for Sustainable Development Association (KLRA+SD)
28. Lawyer Kamek
29. MANDIRI
30. Migrant care
31. National Union of Journalists Malaysia
32. North South Initiative
33. OHMSI Sdn Bhd
34. OKU Rights Matter Project
35. People Like Us Hang Out (PLUHO)
36. Persatuan Martabat Untuk Semua
37. Persatuan Pemangkin Daya Masyarakat
38. Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia
39. Pertubuhan Pelindung Khazanah Alam
40. Project Stability and Accountability for Malaysia (Projek SAMA)
41. Protect Karpal Singh Drive
42. Pusat KOMAS
43. RA Section 14 Petaling Jaya
44. RA Section 20 P.Jaya
45. Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM)
46. Sabah Journalists Association
47. Sabah Youth Movement
48. Sahabat Alam Malaysia
49. Save Malaysia Stop Lynas
50. SAVE Rivers
51. SAWO
52. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia [SABM]
53. Sinar Project
54. SIS Forum (Malaysia)
55. SIUMAN Collective
56. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
57. Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement
58. Third World Network
59. Women’s Aid Organisation

Endorsed by (Individuals):

1. Alice Chan Ai Lee
2. Andrew Aeria
3. Andrew Khoo
4. Ann Lee
5. Anne James
6. Anwar Fazal
7. Azira Aziz
8. Beatrice Aren
9. Chamil Wariya
10. Chang Teck Peng
11. Cindy May Justin
12. Dania Amani
13. Dato’ Dr Amar-Singh HSS
14. Dr. G. Manimaran
15. Dr Linda Lumayag
16. Dr Tricia Yeoh
17. Farrah Nur Fareena Binti Farid Azran
18. Gayathry Venkiteswaran
19. Glen Pengiran
20. Goh You Ping
21. Gowri Subramaniam
22. Heng See Lin
23. Ho Yi Jian
24. Ho Yock Lin
25. Ivy Josiah
26. Juvita Tatan Wan
27. K. Sudhagaran Stanley
28. Lee Ren Xin
29. Lee Shook Fong
30. Lim Yean Nyok
31. Lisa Wong
32. Loo Wuen Yuen
33. Mahyuddin Ahmad Abdul Rahman
34. Mariammah a/p Subramaniam
35. Mohd Ishak Abdillah Ngah
36. Muhammad Ariff Mohamad Nizam
37. Muhammad Nasrun Bin Abd Wahab @ Ismail
38. Naziaty Mohd Yaacob
39. Ng Tien Eng
40. Ngo Sheau Shi
41. PARIMALA A/P NESAMANY
42. Prakash Gopalakrishnan
43. Pushpa Dorsisamy
44. Pushpan Murugiah
45. Roger See Ewe Chee
46. S. S. Yoga
47. Sakuntala Devi d/o Dev Raj
48. Shanti Somasundram
49. Sharmila Sekaran
50. Sheila Gopal Krishnan
51. Shyamala Ponniah Maha Balasandren
52. Sonia Randhawa
53. Sonya Liew Yee Aun
54. Sukumaran
55. Syahila binti Zainal
56. Terence Ooi
57. Thulasi Munisamy
58. U K Menon
59. Vasanthi Nagappan
60. Yuenwah SAN

For further inquiries, please contact:

1. 1. Lim Jih-Ming, Communication Officer, CIJ at comms@cijmalaysia.net
   2. Nalini Elumalai, Senior Malaysia Program Officer, ARTICLE 19 at nalini.elumalai@article19.org
   3. Prishanth Linggaraj, Policy and Legal Research Officer, C4 Center at prishanth@c4center.org